AI Image Readiness Levels — 3 Tiers
When an image is submitted, we simultaneously assess three dimensions: Resolution, Aspect Ratio, and Production Type. All three must align—high resolution with an incorrect aspect ratio, or a correct aspect ratio but the job requires a Vector file, will still not pass.
Large prints viewed from a distance, such as backdrops or outdoor banners, only require a resolution of 72–100 dpi at actual print size. Good quality AI images with dimensions of 1024–2048 px often pass for jobs wider than 1.5 meters because the larger the print, the further it's viewed from—missing pixels are not visible to the naked eye.
The image has potential for use, but still has one or more issues that need to be resolved, such as insufficient resolution for the desired size, incorrect aspect ratio, or erroneous text in the image (AI image generators often make mistakes with text).
These issues can be fixed with another layer of AI—using an Upscaler to increase resolution, Outpainting to extend image borders to achieve the correct aspect ratio, or Inpainting to correct text in the image. We can perform these actions in many cases, though additional charges may apply depending on complexity.
For some types of work, raster images from AI cannot be used directly, no matter how high the resolution, because the production process does not primarily use images but requires "Vector Paths" that CNC, laser, or die-cutter machines follow—which AI images can only create as pixels, without inherent Vector Paths.
Converting from raster to Vector with Auto-Trace might work for very simple shapes, but for logos, text, or complex details, only a Graphic Designer can redraw them.
Is the design you created actually producible?
Beyond files and resolution, there's another equally important dimension: Is the design itself physically feasible? Many beautiful designs in design software, or those created by AI, were not designed by someone familiar with the limitations of real production processes, which can lead to unproducible work, inflated costs, or short-lived usability.
Designs that violate the physical limitations of materials or machinery, no matter the investment, cannot be produced as designed.
- Channel letter strokes thinner than 3 mm Acrylic or metal this thin breaks easily during cutting and transport.
- Letters or shapes with unconnected floating parts Must have bridges to hold the piece in place.
- Gradient color shades on LED channel letters LEDs are point lights—cannot create smooth gradients as designed.
- Die-cut shapes with multiple sharp internal corners Cutting machines require a minimum radius at all corners.
- Internal hollows that weaken the material structure too much e.g., acrylic with internal cuts leaving insufficient material to support weight.
Designs that are technically feasible but incur much higher costs than anticipated, often due to mockups appearing simple but concealing expensive details.
- Signs that look entirely metallic in the design If genuine stainless steel is required, the price may be several times higher than composite materials.
- Full RGB Pixel LED because many colors are desired If a static display is sufficient, a normal backlit option is much more cost-effective.
- Organic shapes requiring high-precision CNC work Machine time increases by 5–10 times compared to standard shapes.
- Mirror polish or special finishes on all surfaces Polishing non-focal point surfaces adds unnecessary cost.
- Sizes larger than necessary for the space A 3m sign in a narrow alley—visibility does not increase proportionally with cost.
Designs that are producible and affordable but have limitations in practical use that lead to results not meeting expectations.
- Colors in the design not available in real materials e.g., gradient vinyl is not sold; UV printing must be used instead, which differs in price.
- Letters smaller than 5 cm on a sign viewed from 5 meters or more Invisible to the naked eye—information included is wasted.
- Outdoor materials not designed for Thailand's UV conditions e.g., monomeric stickers for permanent outdoor use peel within 1–2 years.
- Designs meant to be mounted on existing surfaces that are incompatible e.g., a sign designed to attach to glass, but the actual location is a concrete wall.
- Very small details lost when printed at large actual size Textures, patterns, or line work that look good on a 72 dpi screen may disappear when printed.
Workflow and Why Designers Need to Understand Production
Specify: Width×Height (cm/m), production method (print / cut / engrave), and intended use. We will assess and reply within 1 business day.
Along with clear reasons and options, such as resolution enlargement, layout adjustment, or entirely new artwork.
Yellow: We can handle AI Upscale / Outpaint directly. · Red: Requires a Graphic Designer first. See details on the right.
We send proofs for layout, color, and size review before production every time, ensuring no surprises.
Printing, cutting, engraving, and assembly according to the specifications of each product.
Not every designer specializes in actual production work. A designer who creates files for social media may not know about Bleed, CMYK, or Vector Paths at all, which leads to repeated revisions and wastes time for both parties.
- Correctly prepare Vector files in Adobe Illustrator with complete paths.
- Set Bleed (3–5 mm) and Safe Zone according to print specifications.
- Select CMYK color mode and understand its limitations compared to RGB.
- Outline all text before submitting files (prevents missing fonts).
- Understand material limitations, such as minimum letter size for laser cutting.
- Submitting RGB, causing color discrepancies in the actual print.
- Text not outlined, causing fonts to be missing or change when the file is opened.
- No bleed, resulting in missing edges or white strips after cutting.
- Incorrect scale, e.g., A4 designed but printed A1, making text too small.
Unsure if your image is usable?
Send us your image for assessment—no charge.
Please also provide the job size and desired production method.